Lockdown Effects on Air Quality in Megacities During the First and Second Waves of COVID-19 Pandemic

Air pollution is among the highest contributors to mortality worldwide, especially in urban areas. During spring 2020, many countries enacted social distancing measures in order to slow down the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A particularly drastic measure, the "lockdown”, urged people to stay at home and thereby prevent new COVID-19 infections during the first (2020) and second wave (2021) of the pandemic. In turn, it also reduced traffic and industrial activities. But how much did these lockdown measures improve air quality in large cities, and are there differences in how air quality was affected? Here, we analyse data from two megacities: London as an example for Europe and Delhi as an example for Asia. We consider data during first and second-wave lockdowns and compare them to 2019 values. Overall, we find a reduction in almost all air pollutants with intriguing differences between the two cities except Delhi in 2021. In London, despite smaller average concentrations, we still observe high-pollutant states and an increased tendency towards extreme events (a higher kurtosis of the probability density during lockdown) during 2020 and low pollution levels during 2021. For Delhi, we observe a much stronger decrease in pollution concentrations, including high pollution states during 2020 and higher pollution levels in 2021. These results could help to design policies to improve long-term air quality in megacities.

Lockdown Effects on Air Quality in Megacities During the First and Second Waves of COVID-19 Pandemic

Air pollution is among the highest contributors to mortality worldwide, especially in urban areas. During spring 2020, many countries enacted social distancing measures in order to slow down the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A particularly drastic measure, the “lockdown”, urged people to stay at home and thereby prevent new COVID-19 infections during the first (2020) and second wave (2021) of the pandemic. In turn, it also reduced traffic and industrial activities. But how much did these lockdown measures improve air quality in large cities, and are there differences in how air quality was affected? Here, we analyse data from two megacities: London as an example for Europe and Delhi as an example for Asia. We consider data during first and second-wave lockdowns and compare them to 2019 values. Overall, we find a reduction in almost all air pollutants with intriguing differences between the two cities except Delhi in 2021. In London, despite smaller average concentrations, we still observe high-pollutant states and an increased tendency towards extreme events (a higher kurtosis of the probability density during lockdown) during 2020 and low pollution levels during 2021. For Delhi, we observe a much stronger decrease in pollution concentrations, including high pollution states during 2020 and higher pollution levels in 2021. These results could help to design policies to improve long-term air quality in megacities. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40030-022-00702-9.

Assessment of exposure to airborne aerosol and bio-aerosol particles and their deposition in the respiratory tract of subway metro passengers and workers

This research paper presents an investigative study of airborne aerosol particles (PM2.5) and bio-aerosol particles (bacteria and fungi) inside subway metro stations and their deposition dose in the respiratory tract of exposed passengers and workers. In this study, aerosol monitoring and bio-aerosol sampling were conducted along the metro line and inside metro stations to determine the daily average exposure levels of passengers and workers. The deposition of aerosol and bio-aerosol particles in the respiratory tract of healthy adult males and females was calculated using Multipath Particles Dosimetry Model. The exposure assessment revealed that exposure to fine airborne particles (<1 μm) was dominant;more than 40% of total aerosol deposition and 10–16% of bio-aerosol deposition were found in the pulmonary region of the respiratory tract. Higher deposition dose of particles was observed in males in comparison to females. In the journey along the metro line, a high deposition dose was found during in-train travel and in the underground metro station. Severalfold higher deposition doses were found in the respiratory tract of subway metro workers due to the longer exposure duration. Recent studies have confirmed the spread of COVID-19 virus through airborne particles of size <2.5 μm and airborne transmission was found to be significantly more in indoor spaces. Thus, it is critical to study the exposure levels and deposition dose of fine airborne particles in the human respiratory tract to assess the possible health risks and devise ways to maintain a healthy metro environment.

Association of air pollution and meteorological variables with COVID-19 incidence: Evidence from five megacities in India.

Although lockdown of the industrial and transport sector and stay at home advisories to counter the COVID-19 pandemic have shown that the air quality has improved during this time, very little is known about the role of ambient air pollutants and meteorology in facilitating its transmission. This paper presents the findings from a study that was conducted to evaluate whether air quality index (AQI), three primary pollutants (PM2.5, PM10 and CO), Ground level ozone (O3) and three meteorological variables (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed) have promoted the COVID-19 transmission in five megacities of India. The results show significant correlation of PM2.5, PM10, CO, O3 concentrations, AQI and meteorological parameters with the confirmed cases and deaths during the lockdown period. Among the meteorological variables considered, temperature strongly correlated with the COVID-19 cases and deaths during the lockdown (r=0.54;0.25) and unlock period (r=0.66;0.25). Among the pollutants, ozone, and among the meteorological variables, temperature, explained the highest variability, up to 34% and 30% respectively, for COVID-19 confirmed cases and deaths. AQI was not a significant parameter for explaining the variations in confirmed and death cases. WS and RH could explain 10-11% and 4-6% variations of COVID-19 cases. A GLM model could explain 74% and 35% variability for confirmed cases and deaths during the lockdown and 66% and 19% variability during the unlock period. The results suggest that meteorological parameters may have promoted the COVID-19 incidences, especially the confirmed cases. Our findings may encourage future studies to explore more about the role of ambient air pollutants and meteorology on transmission of COVID-19 and similar infectious diseases.